Enter your details:
Name:
E-mail:
 
Thank you for subscribing.
Subscribe to our newsletter!


Manuel Loureiro1, Marta Hurst1, Beatriz Valongo1, Pantelis Nikolaidis2, Lorenzo Laporta1, José Afonso1

1University of Porto, Faculty of Sports, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Porto, Portugal
2Hellenic Army Academy, Department of Physical and Cultural Education, Athens, Greece

A Comprehensive Mapping of High-Level Men’s Volleyball Gameplay through Social Network Analysis: Analysing Serve, Side-Out, Side-Out Transition and Transition

Monten. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2017, 6(2), 35-41 | DOI: 10.26773/mjssm.2017.09.005

Abstract (ENG)

A deeper understanding of the factors behind performance and their interactions is essential to promote better training practices. Notwithstanding, the focus often relies on the outcomes of players’ actions (e.g., efficacy rates), whereas the nature and variations of particular classes of actions remain largely unexplored. Our purpose was to conduct a systemic analysis of categorical game variables and their interactions using Social Network Analysis. Game actions were counted as nodes and their interactions as edges. Eigenvector centrality values were calculated for each node. Eight matches of the Men’s World Cup 2015 were analysed, composing a total of 27 sets (1,209 rallies). Four game complexes were considered: Complex 0 (Serve), Complex I (Side-out), Complex II (Side-out transition) and Complex III (Transition). Results showed that teams frequently play in-system when in Complex I (i.e. under ideal conditions), but present reduced variation with regard to attack zones and tempos, whereas in Complex II teams most often play out-of-system. Based on these findings, it was concluded that practicing with non-ideal conditions is paramount for good performance in Complex II. Furthermore, most literature combines Complex II and Complex III as a single unit (counter-attack); however, our results reinforce the notion that these two game complexes differ and should be analysed separately.

Keywords (ENG)

Performance Analysis, Systemic Analysis, Social Networks, Game Logic



View full article
(PDF – 570KB)

References

Afonso, J., & Mesquita, I. (2011). Determinants of block cohesiveness and attack efficacy in high-level women’s volleyball. European Journal of Sport Science, 11(1), 69-75.

Afonso, J., Mesquita, I., Marcelino, R., & Silva, J. A. (2010). Analysis of the setter’s tactical action in high-performance women’s volleyball. Kinesiology, 42(1), 82-89.

Afonso, J., Mesquita, I., & Palao, J. M. (2005). Relationship between the use of commit-block and the number of blockers and block effectiveness. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 36-45.

Afonso, J., Moraes, J., Mesquita, I., Marcelino, R., & Duarte, T. (2009). Variables associated with the effect of serve-reception, in high-level men’s volleyball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(4), S127-128.

Araújo, R., Martins, A., Afonso, J., Botelho, S., Coutinho, P., & Mesquita, I. (2011). Tactical determinants of the attack player in high-level male volleyball. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 11(Suppl.4), 36.

Bergeles, N., & Nikolaidou, M. (2011). Setter’s performance and attack tempo as determinants of attack efficacy in Olympic-level male volleyball teams. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(3), 535-544.

Bourbousson, J., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Seve, C. (2010). Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(2), 150-166.

Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social networks, 29(4), 555-564.

Clemente, F. M. M. F.& Mendes,R. (2015). There are differences between centrality levels of volleyball players in different competitive levels? Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 272 - 276.

Costa, G., Afonso, J., Brant, E., & Mesquita, I. (2012). Differences in game patterns between male and female youth volleyball. Kinesiology, 44(1), 60-66.

Costa, G. C., Caetano, R., Ferreira, N. N., Junqueira, G., Afonso, J., Costa, R. D., & Mesquita, I. (2011). Determinants of attack tactics in Youth male elite volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(1), 96-104.

Cotta, C., Mora, A. M., Merelo, J. J., & Merelo-Molina, C. (2013). A network analysis of the 2010 FIFA world cup champion team play. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 26(1), 21-42.

Fransen, K., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Loughead, T. M., Vanbeselaere, N., De Cuyper, B., Vande Broek, G., & Boen, F. (2015). Who takes the lead? Social network analysis as a pioneering tool to investigate shared leadership within sports teams. Social Networks, 43, 28-38.

Hileno, R., & Buscà, B. (2012). Herramienta observacional para analizar la cobertura del ataque en voleibol. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 12(47), 557-570.

Laporta, L., Nikolaidis, P., Thomas, L., & Afonso, J. (2015). The importance of loosely systematized game phases in sports: The case of attack coverage systems in high-level women’s volleyball. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 4(1), 19-24.

Lebed, F. (2007). A dolphin only looks like a fish: players’ behaviour analysis is not enough for game understanding in the light of the systems approach - a response to the reply by McGarry and Franks. European Journal of Sport Science, 7(1), 55-62.

Lithio, D., & Webb, E. (2006). Optimizing a volleyball serve. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Undergraduate Math Journal, 7(2), 1-20.

Lusher, D., Robins, G., & Kremer, P. (2010). The application of social network analysis to team sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14(4), 211-224.

Manzanares, P., & Ortega, E. (2009). Techniques used and efficacy of volleyball skills in relation to gender. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(2), 281-293.

McGarry, T. (2009). Applied and theoretical perspectives of performance analysis in sport: scientific issues and challenges. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(1), 128-140.

McGarry, T., Anderson, D., Wallace, S., Hughes, M., & Franks, I. (2002). Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(10), 771-781.

Mendes, P. P. K. D. D. A. N. P. J. M. J. (2010). Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 14, 170–176.

Mesquita, I., & Graça, A. (2002). Probing the strategic knowledge of an elite volleyball setter: a case study. International Journal of Volleyball Research, 5(1), 13-17.

Palomares, N. (2008). Toward a theory of goal detection in social interaction: effects of contextual ambiguity and tactical functionality on goal inferences and inference certainty. Communication Research, 35, 109-149.

Pow, J., Gayen, K., Elliott, L., & Raeside, R. (2012). Understanding complex interactions using social network analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(19pt20), 2772-2779.

Quatman, C., & Chelladurai, P. (2008). Social Network theory and analysis: A complementary lens for inquiry. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 338-360.

Quiroga, M. E., García-Manso, J. M., Rodríguez-Ruiz, D., Sarmiento, S., De Saa, Y., & Moreno, M. P. (2010). Relation between in-game role and service characteristics in elite women’s volleyball. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(9), 2316-2321.

Sánchez-Moreno, J., Marcelino, R., Mesquita, I., & Ureña, A. (2015). Analysis of the rally length as a critical incident of the game in elite male volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(2), 620-631.

Travassos, B., Davids, K., Araújo, D., & Esteves, P. (2013). Performance analysis in team sports: Advances from an Ecological Dynamics approach. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(1), 83-95.

Walter, F., Lames, M., & McGarry, T. (2007). Analysis of sports performance as a dynamical system by means of the relative phase. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 6(2), 35-41.